Published Research

The evidence for traditional peer support’s efficacy abounds. Now, there’s also mounting peer-reviewed research on Supportiv’s unique digital model of peer support via real-time professionally moderated, live small group chats, and the clinical outcomes and return-on-investment (ROI) achieved.

Exploring the Impact of Digital Peer Support Services on Meeting Unmet Needs Within an Employee Assistance Program: Retrospective Cohort Study

---

JMIR Human Factors
Date: February 25, 2025
Link

Publication highlights:

The paper documents a retrospective cohort study of individuals who used Supportiv digital peer support, offered by the MINES Employee Assistance Plan.

Key paper findings based on embedding Supportiv within the EAP’s offerings include:

• An average of 2.07 fewer therapy sessions per participant (p < .001) on a five therapy session EAP model, within a matched cohort sample. This result boasts a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.77)
• Strong reductions in negative emotional sentiment for participants: sadness reduced by 57.50%, loneliness reduced by 55.04%, and stress reduced by 56.47%
• Over 73% of peer support users engaged in the 24/7 service outside of the regular business hours of 8am-5pm, when clinical care is frequently unavailable

Role of Synchronous, Moderated, and Anonymous Peer Support Chats on Reducing Momentary Loneliness in Older Adults: Retrospective Observational Study

---

JMIR Formative Research
Date: October 25, 2024
Link

Publication highlights:

Using Supportiv’s moderated online peer-to-peer support solution produced statistically significant improvements in Senior loneliness and optimism for a Medicare plan, even in a single live, moderated chat.

Of particular interest, after just 8 and 9 minutes, respectively, participants began to see:

• Up to a 49.43% decrease in loneliness
• Up to a 33.71% increase in optimism
• Much stronger improvements in group chat conditions vis 1:1 interactions

“Digital peer support interventions for emotional struggles contrast the usual provider-based clinical care models because they offer more accessible, direct support for empowerment, highlighting the users’ autonomy, competence, and relatedness.”